set13-61 by .

Converging Horizons: Unified Causality, Buddhist Oneness, and Quantum Singularities
I. Introduction: Bridging Ancient Wisdom and Modern Physics
The human quest to comprehend the fundamental nature of reality has given rise to diverse yet sometimes strikingly resonant systems of thought. This report embarks on an exploration of the profound conceptual territories where Buddhist philosophy's sophisticated understanding of unified cause-and-effect and essential oneness intersects with the enigmatic nature of quantum singularities and related quantum phenomena, as encountered in modern theoretical physics. Such an endeavor seeks to unearth potential parallels and conceptual bridges between ancient contemplative insights into existence and the often counter-intuitive, cutting-edge discoveries of contemporary science.
The intellectual appeal of this comparative analysis lies in its potential to foster a deeper, more holistic understanding of reality. It suggests that different modes of human inquiry—the introspective and philosophical traditions of the East, and the empirical and mathematical methodologies of Western science—might, in their most profound explorations, converge upon similar fundamental truths regarding interconnectedness, the nature of causality, and the ultimate constitution of existence. The very act of seeking such connections reflects a contemporary intellectual inclination towards interdisciplinary synthesis, perhaps born from a sense that purely materialistic or reductionist explanations may not fully capture the richness of reality or the depth of human experience. Ancient wisdom traditions, particularly Buddhism, offer complementary perspectives that have been refined over millennia of contemplative practice and rigorous philosophical debate.
However, this undertaking is not without its inherent challenges. It is crucial to avoid superficial analogies and to respect the distinct epistemologies, terminologies, and ultimate aims of Buddhist philosophy and quantum physics. Correlation in conceptual structure does not imply direct causation between the two fields, nor does it mean an equivalence of meaning in all contexts. The objective here is to identify and analyze conceptual resonances, fostering a dialogue that illuminates both traditions, rather than attempting to force them into a single, undifferentiated framework.
This report will argue that while distinct in their methodologies and ultimate aims, Buddhist philosophical tenets—particularly Pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination), Śūnyatā (emptiness), and the non-dual or simultaneous conception of cause and effect—exhibit striking conceptual parallels with interpretations of quantum phenomena such as singularities (especially the Big Bang), quantum entanglement, and the holographic principle. These parallels predominantly center on themes of profound interconnectedness, the breakdown of classical linear causality, and a non-substantial view of reality. Such an exploration invites a richer, more integrated dialogue between these historically separate domains of human thought, potentially contributing to a more holistic worldview where insights from different human endeavors are seen as potentially complementary rather than mutually exclusive.
The subsequent sections will systematically unfold this argument. Section II will elucidate the core Buddhist principles of oneness and unified causality, drawing from key doctrines. Section III will then delve into the relevant concepts from quantum physics, focusing on singularities, the Big Bang, entanglement, and the holographic principle. Section IV will form the core of the comparative analysis, systematically examining the convergences and divergences between these Buddhist and quantum concepts. Finally, Section V will offer concluding reflections on the value of this interdisciplinary dialogue and suggest avenues for further contemplation.

Tracklist

1.	set13-1	0:32

2.	set13-2	0:32

3.	set13-3	0:40

4.	set13-4	1:44

5.	set13-5	1:39

6.	set13-6	4:17

7.	set13-7	0:27

8.	set13-8	4:18

9.	set13-9	4:19

10.	set13-10	4:18

11.	set13-11	4:18

12.	set13-12	0:24

13.	set13-13*	3:12

14.	set13-14	4:18

15.	set13-15	4:17

16.	set13-16	0:40

17.	set13-17	0:32

18.	set13-18	0:44

19.	set13-19	1:28

20.	set13-20	4:22

21.	set13-21	4:22

22.	set13-22	4:22

23.	set13-23	4:22

24.	set13-24	4:22

25.	set13-25	4:22

26.	set13-26	4:22

27.	set13-27	4:22

28.	set13-28	4:22

29.	set13-29	4:22

30.	set13-30	4:22

31.	set13-31	3:34

32.	set13-32	4:22

33.	set13-33	4:22

34.	set13-34	1:42

35.	set13-35	4:22

36.	set13-36	4:22

37.	set13-37	4:22

38.	set13-38	2:40

39.	set13-39	3:52

40.	set13-40	4:22

41.	set13-41	4:22

42.	set13-42	4:22

43.	set13-43	4:22

44.	set13-44	4:22

45.	set13-45	4:22

46.	set13-46	4:22

47.	set13-47	4:22

48.	set13-48	4:22

49.	set13-49	4:22

50.	set13-50	4:22

51.	set13-51	4:22

52.	set13-52	4:22

53.	set13-53	4:22

54.	set13-54	4:22

55.	set13-55	4:18

56.	set13-56	4:18

57.	set13-57	4:18

58.	set13-58	4:18

59.	set13-59	4:18

60.	set13-60	4:18

61.	set13-61	4:18

Videos

Credits

released June 28, 2025

II. The Buddhist Tapestry: Oneness and Unified Causality
Buddhist philosophy offers a complex and nuanced understanding of reality, characterized by its emphasis on interdependence, impermanence, and the nature of suffering and its cessation. Central to this understanding are concepts that describe a universe deeply interconnected, where conventional notions of separate, independently existing entities and linear causality are fundamentally challenged.
A. Pratītyasamutpāda (Dependent Origination): The Interdependent Web
At the heart of Buddhist ontology lies the principle of Pratītyasamutpāda, commonly translated as "dependent origination" or "conditioned co-arising". This doctrine, shared by all schools of Buddhism, posits that all phenomena, or dharmas, arise and exist in dependence upon other phenomena. The classical formulation encapsulates this: "if this exists, that exists; if this ceases to exist, that also ceases to exist". This is not merely a statement about temporal succession but a profound assertion about the conditioned and contingent nature of all existence. Nothing possesses an independent, self-sustaining mode of being; everything is part of a vast, dynamic web of mutual causality.
The teaching is often illustrated through the twelve links (nidānas) in the chain of dependent origination: ignorance (avidyā), mental formations (saṃskāra), consciousness (vijñāna), name-and-form (nāmarūpa), the six sense spheres (ṣaḍāyatana), contact (sparśa), feeling (vedanā), craving (tṛṣṇā), clinging (upādāna), becoming (bhava), birth (jāti), and finally, aging and death (jarāmaraṇa). This chain demonstrates how suffering (dukkha) arises from a cascade of interconnected and conditioning factors, perpetuating saṃsāra, the cycle of repeated birth, death, and rebirth. The goal of Buddhist practice, in large part, is to understand and break this chain.
The implications of Pratītyasamutpāda for a vision of universal interconnectedness are far-reaching. It inherently negates the possibility of any isolated, self-contained entity. Every object, every event, every being is what it is only in relation to other objects, events, and beings. This concept evolved in later Buddhist thought into explicit doctrines of interdependence and the interconnectedness of all things, influencing ideas such as the "butterfly effect"—where a small action can have vast, unforeseen consequences—and forming a philosophical basis for Engaged Buddhism, which applies these principles to social and ecological concerns.
Within this framework of universal conditionality, cause and effect are not seen as absolute, separately existing entities. Instead, they are themselves dependently arisen and mutually defining. A "cause" is only designated as such in relation to an "effect," and an "effect" is only an effect because of its "cause." They co-arise and are intelligible only in relation to each other. This understanding of Pratītyasamutpāda, with its denial of inherent, independent existence, directly lays the groundwork for the equally crucial Buddhist concept of Śūnyatā (emptiness). If a phenomenon's existence is entirely contingent upon other phenomena for its arising and sustenance , it logically follows that it cannot possess an unchanging, independent essence or "self-nature" that defines it from within. This very lack of an intrinsic, independent essence is what Śūnyatā describes. Thus, Pratītyasamutpāda can be seen as the functional explanation or logical precursor to the doctrine of emptiness. This foundational principle challenges anthropocentric views by situating human existence within the same intricate web of conditionality that governs all other phenomena, thereby fostering a profound sense of ecological and cosmic interconnectedness.

License

CC BY-SA 3.0. See the Creative Commons website for details.